Primary & Secondary maths tuition

Expert math tutor providing one-on-one support for young learners.

Kinvara Rd.

Ardrahan, Co. Galway

123 456 789

info@example.com

Goldsmith Hall

New York, NY 90210

07:30 - 19:00

Monday to Friday

The child has one intuitive aim: self development

Reaction to the Junior Cert Maths paper

The Junior Cert higher level maths exam in 2023 received a mixed reaction from students and teachers alike. While some found it accessible and diverse, others felt that it was excessively wordy, making it challenging for students to decipher what was being asked. The lack of choice on the paper was also a point of concern for higher level students, as they had to attempt all questions, leaving no room to focus on their preferred topics.

The absence of a marking scheme added further ambiguity for students, though they were advised on the time allocation for each question. The paper included a question on the universal social charge, which was not well-received, and some parts of Part B were deemed tricky, potentially leaving students struggling to answer it.

The higher level paper covered a wide range of topics, including co-ordinate geometry, trigonometry, algebra, statistics, probability, geometry, financial maths, sets, and number systems. While questions on statistics, trigonometry, co-ordinate geometry, and algebra pleased students, geometry, financial maths, and functions presented more challenging aspects that required deeper thinking.

On the other hand, the ordinary level paper was regarded as straightforward and accessible. It featured well-guided and encouraging questions spanning various topics, such as number systems, area & volume, probability, functions, trigonometry, co-ordinate geometry, and algebra. Notably, number patterns, distance speed, and time were absent from the ordinary level paper, but overall, students found the questions fair, diverse, and direct.

In summary, the 2023 Junior Cert higher level maths exam garnered mixed opinions from students and teachers. While some appreciated the diversity and accessibility of the paper, others criticized its wordiness and lack of choice. The inclusion of a range of topics challenged students’ thinking abilities, and some questions received varied responses. On the other hand, the ordinary level paper was well-received for its straightforward and fair nature, with students generally content with the questions posed.

Comments are closed.